I started making a list of benchmark instances out of this archive (up to IPC 2006 currently), which I need to finish.
I couldn’t recover the following details about Rintanen’s benchmark set:
When Rintanen had two formulations of the same domain and the corresponding instances (with some domains, there were grounded and nongrounded formulations, for instance), I selected STRIPS formulations and nonground ones over the other ones.
ipc-1998/logistics-round-1-strips has 35 instances, yet Rintanen uses only 30. I decided to pick the first 30 instances for that reason.
ipc-1998/mystery-prime-round-1-strips has 35 instances, yet Rintanen uses only 20. I decided to pick the first 20 instances for that reason.
ipc-1998/mystery-round-1-strips has 30 instances, yet Rintanen uses only 19. I decided to pick the first 19 instances for that reason.
In ipc-2002, it appears that Rintanen used the automatic variations and not he hand-coded ones.
Concerning the IPC 2011 instance sets, it’s most likely that all instances were taken from the sequential, satisficing track, which is why I chose those instances.
Some domains and instances use action costs/metrics, which aren’t currently supported by the encodings. For this reason, the following domains were excluded from the benchmark:
Jussi Rintanen sent us [his benchmark set](https://cloud.luehne.de/s/TuVplTvkzNG8jTO).
I started making a list of benchmark instances out of this archive (up to IPC 2006 currently), which I need to finish.
I couldn’t recover the following details about Rintanen’s benchmark set:
- When Rintanen had two formulations of the same domain and the corresponding instances (with some domains, there were grounded and nongrounded formulations, for instance), I selected STRIPS formulations and nonground ones over the other ones.
- `ipc-1998/logistics-round-1-strips` has 35 instances, yet Rintanen uses only 30. I decided to pick the first 30 instances for that reason.
- `ipc-1998/mystery-prime-round-1-strips` has 35 instances, yet Rintanen uses only 20. I decided to pick the first 20 instances for that reason.
- `ipc-1998/mystery-round-1-strips` has 30 instances, yet Rintanen uses only 19. I decided to pick the first 19 instances for that reason.
- In `ipc-2002`, it appears that Rintanen used the `automatic` variations and not he `hand-coded` ones.
- Concerning the IPC 2011 instance sets, it’s most likely that all instances were taken from the *sequential, satisficing* track, which is why I chose those instances.
- Some domains and instances use action costs/metrics, which aren’t currently supported by the encodings. For this reason, the following domains were excluded from the benchmark:
- `ipc-2008/cyber-security-sequential-satisficing-strips`
- `ipc-2011/barman-sequential-satisficing`
- `ipc-2011/elevator-sequential-satisficing`
- `ipc-2011/no-mystery-sequential-satisficing`
- `ipc-2011/openstacks-sequential-satisficing`
- `ipc-2011/parc-printer-sequential-satisficing`
- `ipc-2011/parking-sequential-satisficing`
- `ipc-2011/peg-solitaire-sequential-satisficing`
- `ipc-2011/scanalyzer-3d-sequential-satisficing`
- `ipc-2011/sokoban-sequential-satisficing`
- `ipc-2011/transport-sequential-satisficing`
- `ipc-2011/woodworking-sequential-satisficing`
patrick
added this to the Extended Paper for TPLP Journal milestone 2017-11-09 15:54:57 +01:00
patrick
self-assigned this 2017-11-09 15:54:57 +01:00
patrick
added the task label 2017-11-09 15:54:57 +01:00
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Jussi Rintanen sent us his benchmark set.
I started making a list of benchmark instances out of this archive (up to IPC 2006 currently), which I need to finish.
I couldn’t recover the following details about Rintanen’s benchmark set:
ipc-1998/logistics-round-1-stripshas 35 instances, yet Rintanen uses only 30. I decided to pick the first 30 instances for that reason.ipc-1998/mystery-prime-round-1-stripshas 35 instances, yet Rintanen uses only 20. I decided to pick the first 20 instances for that reason.ipc-1998/mystery-round-1-stripshas 30 instances, yet Rintanen uses only 19. I decided to pick the first 19 instances for that reason.ipc-2002, it appears that Rintanen used theautomaticvariations and not hehand-codedones.ipc-2008/cyber-security-sequential-satisficing-stripsipc-2011/barman-sequential-satisficingipc-2011/elevator-sequential-satisficingipc-2011/no-mystery-sequential-satisficingipc-2011/openstacks-sequential-satisficingipc-2011/parc-printer-sequential-satisficingipc-2011/parking-sequential-satisficingipc-2011/peg-solitaire-sequential-satisficingipc-2011/scanalyzer-3d-sequential-satisficingipc-2011/sokoban-sequential-satisficingipc-2011/transport-sequential-satisficingipc-2011/woodworking-sequential-satisficing