patrick/anthem
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 15 Releases 21 Activity

Verify interval operator precedence in output #19

New Issue
Closed
opened 2018-05-02 18:18:39 +02:00 by patrick · 1 comment
patrick commented 2018-05-02 18:18:39 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

When writing 1 + 2..5, this seems to be interpreted as (1 + 2)..5 and not 1 + (2..5), which is what I’d have expected.

I believe that this is inconsistent with anthem’s output, which might incorrectly print (1 + 2)..5) as (1 + 2..5).

When writing `1 + 2..5`, this seems to be interpreted as `(1 + 2)..5` and not `1 + (2..5)`, which is what I’d have expected. I believe that this is inconsistent with anthem’s output, which might incorrectly print `(1 + 2)..5)` as `(1 + 2..5)`.
patrick added this to the anthem 0.1.9 milestone 2018-05-02 18:18:39 +02:00
patrick self-assigned this 2018-05-02 18:18:39 +02:00
patrick added the bug label 2018-05-02 18:18:39 +02:00
patrick changed title from Verify interval operator precedence to Verify interval operator precedence in output 2018-05-02 18:18:53 +02:00
patrick commented 2018-05-04 15:52:44 +02:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Fixed by 1f7f6a02b429ac72bde28418a7ea15465bb0c0e7.

Fixed by 1f7f6a02b429ac72bde28418a7ea15465bb0c0e7.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
aesthetic
bug
discussion
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
suggestion
task
wontfix
No Label bug
Milestone
No items
No Milestone anthem 0.1.9
Assignees
Clear assignees
patrick
No Assignees patrick
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: patrick/anthem#19
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?