Improve output
This commit is contained in:
parent
5469f7d7b2
commit
753cc3e5a8
@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
|
||||
axiom: forall N1, N2, N3 (N1 > N2 and N3 > 0 -> N1 * N3 > N2 * N3).
|
||||
|
||||
axiom: p(0) and forall N (N >= 0 and p(N) -> p(N + 1)).
|
||||
|
||||
input: n -> integer.
|
||||
|
||||
axiom: forall N1, N2, N3 (N1 > N2 and N3 > 0 -> N1 * N3 > N2 * N3).
|
||||
axiom: p(0) and forall N (N >= 0 and p(N) -> p(N + 1)).
|
||||
|
||||
assume: n >= 0.
|
||||
|
||||
assert: exists N (forall X (q(X) <-> X = N) and N >= 0 and N * N <= n and (N + 1) * (N + 1) > n).
|
||||
@ -16,6 +15,8 @@ lemma(forward): forall X (p(X) <-> exists N2 (X = N2 and N2 >= 0 and N2 * N2 <=
|
||||
lemma(forward): forall X (q(X) <-> exists N2 (X = N2 and N2 >= 0 and N2 * N2 <= n and not p(N2 + 1))).
|
||||
lemma(forward): forall N2 (N2 >= 0 and not p(N2 + 1) -> (N2 + 1) * (N2 + 1) > n).
|
||||
lemma(forward): forall X (q(X) <-> exists N2 (X = N2 and N2 >= 0 and N2 * N2 <= n and (N2 + 1) * (N2 + 1) > n)).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
lemma(forward): exists N2 (forall X (X = N2 -> (q(X) <-> N2 >= 0 and N2 * N2 <= n and (N2 + 1) * (N2 + 1) > n))).
|
||||
lemma(forward): exists N2 p(N2).
|
||||
lemma(forward): forall N1, N2 (N1 >= 0 and N2 >= 0 and N1 < N2 -> N1 * N1 < N2 * N2).
|
||||
|
@ -133,6 +133,17 @@ impl Problem
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn prove(&self, proof_direction: crate::ProofDirection) -> Result<(), crate::Error>
|
||||
{
|
||||
// TODO: refactor
|
||||
let format_context = FormatContext
|
||||
{
|
||||
program_variable_declaration_ids:
|
||||
std::cell::RefCell::new(VariableDeclarationIDs::new()),
|
||||
integer_variable_declaration_ids:
|
||||
std::cell::RefCell::new(VariableDeclarationIDs::new()),
|
||||
input_constant_declaration_domains: &self.input_constant_declaration_domains.borrow(),
|
||||
variable_declaration_domains: &self.variable_declaration_domains.borrow(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
if proof_direction == crate::ProofDirection::Forward
|
||||
|| proof_direction == crate::ProofDirection::Both
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -141,7 +152,7 @@ impl Problem
|
||||
let mut statements = self.statements.borrow_mut();
|
||||
|
||||
// Initially reset all proof statuses
|
||||
for (_, statements) in statements.iter_mut()
|
||||
for (section_kind, statements) in statements.iter_mut()
|
||||
{
|
||||
for statement in statements.iter_mut()
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -149,10 +160,34 @@ impl Problem
|
||||
{
|
||||
StatementKind::Axiom
|
||||
| StatementKind::Assumption
|
||||
| StatementKind::Program
|
||||
=> statement.proof_status = ProofStatus::AssumedProven,
|
||||
StatementKind::Lemma(crate::ProofDirection::Backward)
|
||||
=> statement.proof_status = ProofStatus::Ignored,
|
||||
| StatementKind::Program =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
// TODO: avoid code duplication
|
||||
let statement_type_output = match section_kind
|
||||
{
|
||||
SectionKind::CompletedDefinitions => "completed definition",
|
||||
SectionKind::IntegrityConstraints => "integrity constraint",
|
||||
SectionKind::Axioms => "axiom",
|
||||
SectionKind::Assumptions => "assumption",
|
||||
SectionKind::Lemmas => "lemma",
|
||||
SectionKind::Assertions => "assertion",
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: refactor
|
||||
match statement.kind
|
||||
{
|
||||
StatementKind::Program => println!(" - {}: {}",
|
||||
statement_type_output,
|
||||
foliage::format::display_formula(&statement.formula,
|
||||
&format_context)),
|
||||
_ => println!(" - {}: {}", statement_type_output,
|
||||
statement.formula),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
statement.proof_status = ProofStatus::AssumedProven;
|
||||
},
|
||||
StatementKind::Lemma(crate::ProofDirection::Backward) =>
|
||||
statement.proof_status = ProofStatus::Ignored,
|
||||
_ => statement.proof_status = ProofStatus::ToProveLater,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -173,7 +208,7 @@ impl Problem
|
||||
let mut statements = self.statements.borrow_mut();
|
||||
|
||||
// Initially reset all proof statuses
|
||||
for (_, statements) in statements.iter_mut()
|
||||
for (section_kind, statements) in statements.iter_mut()
|
||||
{
|
||||
for statement in statements.iter_mut()
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -181,10 +216,34 @@ impl Problem
|
||||
{
|
||||
StatementKind::Axiom
|
||||
| StatementKind::Assumption
|
||||
| StatementKind::Assertion
|
||||
=> statement.proof_status = ProofStatus::AssumedProven,
|
||||
StatementKind::Lemma(crate::ProofDirection::Forward)
|
||||
=> statement.proof_status = ProofStatus::Ignored,
|
||||
| StatementKind::Assertion =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
// TODO: avoid code duplication
|
||||
let statement_type_output = match section_kind
|
||||
{
|
||||
SectionKind::CompletedDefinitions => "completed definition",
|
||||
SectionKind::IntegrityConstraints => "integrity constraint",
|
||||
SectionKind::Axioms => "axiom",
|
||||
SectionKind::Assumptions => "assumption",
|
||||
SectionKind::Lemmas => "lemma",
|
||||
SectionKind::Assertions => "assertion",
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: refactor
|
||||
match statement.kind
|
||||
{
|
||||
StatementKind::Program => println!(" - {}: {}",
|
||||
statement_type_output,
|
||||
foliage::format::display_formula(&statement.formula,
|
||||
&format_context)),
|
||||
_ => println!(" - {}: {}", statement_type_output,
|
||||
statement.formula),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
statement.proof_status = ProofStatus::AssumedProven;
|
||||
},
|
||||
StatementKind::Lemma(crate::ProofDirection::Forward) =>
|
||||
statement.proof_status = ProofStatus::Ignored,
|
||||
_ => statement.proof_status = ProofStatus::ToProveLater,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -248,8 +307,14 @@ impl Problem
|
||||
SectionKind::Assertions => "assertion",
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
println!("- verifying {}: {}", statement_type_output,
|
||||
foliage::format::display_formula(&statement.formula, &format_context));
|
||||
match statement.kind
|
||||
{
|
||||
StatementKind::Program => println!(" - verifying {}: {}",
|
||||
statement_type_output,
|
||||
foliage::format::display_formula(&statement.formula, &format_context)),
|
||||
_ => println!(" - verifying {}: {}", statement_type_output,
|
||||
statement.formula),
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
{
|
||||
Some(_) => (),
|
||||
@ -262,7 +327,7 @@ impl Problem
|
||||
&mut tptp_problem_to_prove_next_statement)
|
||||
.map_err(|error| crate::Error::new_write_tptp_program(error))?;
|
||||
|
||||
log::trace!("TPTP program :\n{}", &tptp_problem_to_prove_next_statement);
|
||||
log::trace!("TPTP program:\n{}", &tptp_problem_to_prove_next_statement);
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: make configurable again
|
||||
let (proof_result, proof_time_seconds) =
|
||||
@ -273,13 +338,13 @@ impl Problem
|
||||
{
|
||||
ProofResult::NotProven =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
println!(" → could not prove statement");
|
||||
println!(" → could not prove statement");
|
||||
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
},
|
||||
ProofResult::Disproven =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
println!(" → statement disproven");
|
||||
println!(" → statement disproven");
|
||||
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
},
|
||||
@ -295,9 +360,9 @@ impl Problem
|
||||
|
||||
match proof_time_seconds
|
||||
{
|
||||
None => println!(" → statement proven"),
|
||||
None => println!(" → statement proven"),
|
||||
Some(proof_time_seconds) =>
|
||||
println!(" → statement proven in {} seconds", proof_time_seconds),
|
||||
println!(" → statement proven in {} seconds", proof_time_seconds),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -155,6 +155,12 @@ impl<'p> Translator<'p>
|
||||
|
||||
for predicate_declaration in self.problem.predicate_declarations.borrow().iter()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Don’t perform completion for input predicates
|
||||
if self.problem.input_predicate_declarations.borrow().contains(predicate_declaration)
|
||||
{
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let completed_definition =
|
||||
completed_definition(predicate_declaration, &mut self.definitions, self.problem);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user